Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Henny v Warden David Paul
as 5:2024cv00239
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henny v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01108
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Henny v. United States of America et al
as 0:2023cv02773
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Defendant:
United States of America, Colette Peters, Andre Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henny v. Segal
as 0:2023cv02259
Petitioner:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henny v. Segal
as 0:2023cv00448
Petitioner:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Respondent:
Warden Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henny v. Matevousian et al
as 0:2022cv02207
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Defendant:
Andre Matevousian, Mistell Starr, T. Vaught and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henny v. O'Connor et al
as 0:2022cv02121
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Defendant:
Patrick T. O'Connor, J. Stanek, Mistelle Starr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henny v. Matevousian et al
as 0:2022cv02122
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Defendant:
Andre Matevousian, Dr. Reyna, T. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henny v. Starr et al
as 0:2022cv01996
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Defendant:
Mistelle Starr, McIntosh and Andre Mousetavian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duffney v. Wright County Health and Human Services
as 0:2021cv02539
Petitioner:
Kimberly Anne Duffney
Respondent:
Wright County Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
