Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Jones v. Gray
as 4:2023cv01650
Petitioner:
Aaron L. Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden David W. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mauer v. Jacobs et al
as 5:2023cv01636
Plaintiff:
Steven C. Mauer
Defendant:
Norman Jacobs and Hope L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mauer v. Jacobs et al
as 5:2023cv01510
Plaintiff:
Steven C. Mauer
Defendant:
Norman Jacobs and Hope L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson Sr. v. Management Training Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv01482
Plaintiff:
Alfred Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Management Training Corporation, Deputy Warden James Craig, Anita Edmonstone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Garza
as 4:2022cv00764
Plaintiff:
Dainon L. Jones
Defendant:
Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Director of Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv05089
Plaintiff:
Aaron L. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Director of Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Governor of Ohio and Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2020cv05466
Petitioner:
Anthony L. Jones
Respondent:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones et al v. DeWine et al
as 2:2020cv03301
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitations and Corrections and Mike DeWine
Plaintiff:
Rubin Williams, James Goodson, Anthony Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones et al v. DeWine et al
as 5:2020cv00981
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitations and Corrections and Governor Mike DeWine
Plaintiff:
Rubin Williams, James Goodson, Anthony Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Shoop
as 5:2019cv02063
Petitioner:
Phillip L. Jones
Respondent:
Warden Tim Shoop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
