Cases 1 - 10 of 758
Hudson v. Hut et al
as 7:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Deontae L Hudson
Defendant:
Hut, McCovery, Hardclaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Peters
as 1:2024cv00113
Petitioner:
Winston L. Harrison
Respondent:
Kenneth Peters, Lanetta Banks and Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Florence v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Florence
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Futral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strong v. Dallas County Commission et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Defendant:
Elizabeth Daniels, Dallas County Commission, Dallas County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Denise Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florence v. Red Eagle Work Center et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Florence
Defendant:
Red Eagle Work Center and Norteshia S. Honaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Chaney (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Isiah Davis
Defendant:
Deontie L. Chaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nix v. Hutton et al
as 7:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Daric L Nix
Defendant:
John Hutton and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Hamm et al
as 6:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
James L Stone
Defendant:
John Hamm and Scotty Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
