Cases 1 - 10 of 55
LAWSON v. SCHERNECKE et al
as 2:2023cv04796
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LAWSON
Defendant:
WARDEN, FDC PHILADELPHIA, ELIZABETH A SCHERNECKE, RAEPH LAUGHINGWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
IN RE: JERRY LAWSON
as 2:2022cv03672
In Re:
JERRY LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2022cv02452
Petitioner:
TYREE LAWSON
Respondent:
GEORGE LITTLE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LAWSON v. SHOUPPE et al
as 2:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
JAMES JOSEPH LAWSON
Defendant:
WARDEN WILLIAM SHOUPPE and DEPUTY WARDEN ETHEL WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv04973
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Defendant:
SECRETRAY JOHN WETZEL, KELLY LONG, MELLISSA SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv04568
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE OFFICER MOSTILLER Badge No. 5935, DETECTIVE KUCHINSKY Badge No. 904 and others
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VALENTA v. BI INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2020cv00912
Defendant:
BI INCORPORATED, VERN (last name unknown), TARA (Supervisor-last name unknown) and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY JOHN VALENTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LAWSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2020cv03358
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
JARROD C. LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LAWSON v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv02457
Defendant:
SCI-PHOENIX A UNIT RHU JANES AND JOHN DOES, MEIJA, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI PHOENIX and others
Plaintiff:
TYREE A. LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. BANTA et al
as 2:2018cv03670
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Defendant:
KELLY LONG, BANTA and SCI PHOENIX'S ENTIRE MAILROOM UNKNOWN PERSONNEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
