Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Gaillard v. Odham et al
as 5:2023ct03154
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gaillard
Defendant:
Jeffrey Odham, Lewis B. Leonard, P. Robinett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS-BEY v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
ALPHONZA LEONARD PHILLIP THOMAS-BEY
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. United States of America
as 5:2023hc02006
Petitioner:
James Leonard Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
THOMAS v. BIDEN
as 1:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
ALPHONZA LEONARD PHILLIP THOMAS
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
THOMPSON v. USA
as 1:2022cv00203
Petitioner:
DARREN LEONARD THOMPSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hinton et al v. Cooper et al
as 5:2021ct03021
Plaintiff:
Michael Collins Wilson, Byron McNeely, Kenneth Leonard Dunbar and others
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, John Herring, Erik A. Hooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, LLP et al
as 1:2020cv01173
Plaintiff:
DERRICK MIKE ALLEN, SR.
Defendant:
BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, LLP, KEARNS DAVIS, DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, LLP et al
as 1:2020cv00978
Defendant:
BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, LLP and KEARNS DAVIS
Plaintiff:
DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard v. USA
as 5:2020cv00295
Petitioner:
Michael Donnell Leonard
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
LEE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00374
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
MACON LEONARD LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
