Cases 1 - 10 of 255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06655
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06287
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jingyuan Li v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv07495
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jingyuan Li
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Yahtues v. Old Colony Correctional Center et al
as 1:2024cv12020
Defendant:
Old Colony Correctional Center, James M. O'Gara, Jr., Stephen Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
Malachi I. Yahtues
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Moss v. Leesburg Medical Regional Center et al
as 8:2024cv01585
Defendant:
Gregory Lewis, Richard Li, Jorge Nieto and others
Plaintiff:
British Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sun v. Mo et al
as 1:2024cv03630
Plaintiff:
Yi Sun
Defendant:
Hugh H MO, Tsai Chung Chao, New York City Police Department : and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Terri McGuire-Mollica v. Richard Griffin, et al
as 24-11081
Plaintiff:
TERRI MCGUIRE-MOLLICA
Defendant:
RICHARD GRIFFIN, XINYU LI and SHARON BAILEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
