Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Palmer v. Hodges et al
as 4:2023cv04044
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Defendant:
T Hodges, Deputy Warden J. Miners, Former Officer Brinkley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Armstrong et al
as 4:2023cv04045
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Defendant:
Debroha Ann Armstrong and Warbritten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Miners et al
as 4:2023cv04041
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Defendant:
Deputy Warden J. Miners and Deborah Ann Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Armstrong et al
as 4:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Defendant:
Debroha Ann Armstrong and Warbritten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Hodges et al
as 4:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Defendant:
T Hodges, J Miners, Brinkley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Miners et al
as 4:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Defendant:
J Miners and Deborah Ann Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Moore et al
as 3:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Levi Lloyd White
Defendant:
Eric Moore, Poinsett County Jail, NEA Hospitol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shell v. Lingo et al
as 6:2022cv06120
Plaintiff:
Robert Dale Shell
Defendant:
Sergeant Josh Lingo, Lloyd Elkins, Gregory Crain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shell v. Lingo et al
as 4:2022cv01121
Plaintiff:
Robert Dale Shell
Defendant:
Josh Lingo, Lloyd Elkins, Gregory Crain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chism v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
Nathan Harold Chism
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshal Dale Reed, Jennifer Carl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
