Cases 1 - 10 of 171
William Cope, Jr. v. Luther Luckett Correctional Complex, et al
as 24-5496
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DOUGLAS COPE, JR.
Defendant:
LUTHER LUCKETT CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, et al., AMY ROBEY, Warden, PATRICIA GUNTER, Deputy Security and others
Robert Luckett v. Officer Cramer, et al
as 24-1835
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LUCKETT
Defendant:
OFFICER CRAMER and OFFICER EDDELMON
Luckett v. Nurse Hannah et al
as 2:2024cv02100
Plaintiff:
Jumarious Luckett
Defendant:
Nurse Hannah, Nurse Michelle, Liz DeLong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boykin v. County Of Westchester et al
as 7:2024cv02865
Defendant:
Jermaine Boykin, County Of Westchester, Lemar Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hambrick v. Robey et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Brandon Hambrick, Jr.
Respondent:
Amy Robey and Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Luckett v. Carter et al
as 2:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Keith Luckett
Defendant:
Ruby Carter, Easman, Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hambrick v. Robey et al
as 3:2023cv00675
Petitioner:
Brandon Hambrick, Jr.
Respondent:
Amy Robey and Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry Williamson v. Amy Robey
as 23-6109
Petitioner:
LARRY WILLIAMSON
Respondent:
AMY ROBEY, Warden, Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Cope v. Luther Luckett Correctional Complex et al
as 3:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
William Douglas Cope, Jr.
Defendant:
Luther Luckett Correctional Complex, Warden Amy Robey, Deputy Security Patricia Gunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Detention Officer Lawrence et al
as 4:2023cv04443
Plaintiff:
Cherelle Moore
Defendant:
Detention Officer Lawrence and Detention Officer Luckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
