Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Daise v. Uhler et al
as 9:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Travis Daise
Defendant:
Donald Uhler, Paul Fletcher, Patricia Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimsley v. Nike Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv10745
Plaintiff:
Robert Grimsley
Defendant:
Nike Corp., Phil Knight doing business as Nike Corp., Amazon Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fusco v. Westchester County Department of Corrections
as 1:2021cv01943
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Fusco
Defendant:
Westchester County Department of Corrections, County of Dutchess, Nory Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valencia v. The City of Yonkers et al
as 7:2019cv00548
Defendant:
Moore, Scannapieco, Moriano and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Valencia and Frank E. Valencia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walbrook v. The N.Y. State Division of Parole et al
as 1:2018cv08576
Plaintiff:
Robert Walbrook
Defendant:
The N.Y. State Division of Parole and Parole Officer Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walbrook v. The New York State Division of Parole et al
as 1:2018cv08104
Plaintiff:
Robert Walbrook
Defendant:
The New York State Division of Parole, Parole Officer Lane, Parole Officer Rita Balroop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph v. Annucci et al
as 7:2018cv07197
Defendant:
Gail Williams, Lane Kortright, Samuel Encarnacion and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Fierro et al
as 6:2018cv06434
Plaintiff:
Adam Christopher Walker
Defendant:
Scott Fierro, James Wellington, Todd Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Tilbe et al
as 9:2018cv00438
Defendant:
Michael Kirkpatrick and Adam Tilbe
Plaintiff:
Don B. Lane and Donald B. Lane, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. City of New York
as 1:2018cv01721
Plaintiff:
Donwin M. Ballard
Defendant:
Lane and Nardon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
