Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Dunlap #124173 v. Thomas et al
as 2:2024cv01132
Plaintiff:
Larry Donnell Dunlap
Defendant:
Siji Thomas and Naphcare Incoporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Dunlap v. Ryan Thornell, et al
as 23-15962
Petitioner / Appellant:
LARRY DONNELL DUNLAP
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, RYAN THORNELL and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Dunlap #124173 v. Thomas et al
as 2:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Larry Donnell Dunlap
Defendant:
Siji Thomas, Karanja Adams, Ronald Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunlap #124173 v. Ducey et al
as 2:2022cv01305
Plaintiff:
Larry Donnell Dunlap
Defendant:
Douglas Ducey, David Shinn, Unknown Purden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunlap #124173 v. United States Department of Treasury
as 2:2021cv02202
Plaintiff:
Larry Donnell Dunlap
Defendant:
United States Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunlap #124173 v. Shinn et al
as 4:2021cv00457
Petitioner:
Larry Donnell Dunlap
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dunlap #124173 v. Shinn et al
as 4:2021cv00314
Petitioner:
Larry Donnell Dunlap
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dunlap #124173 v. Shinn et al
as 4:2021cv00308
Petitioner:
Larry Donnell Dunlap
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dunlap #124173 v. Shinn et al
as 4:2021cv00311
Petitioner:
Larry Donnell Dunlap
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dunlap #124173 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2021cv00282
Petitioner:
Larry Donnell Dunlap
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
