Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Leaks, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2021cv00020
Defendant:
Paul DeSando, Jeff Troutman, Mike Nelligan, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Donnell Leaks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEAK v. CLARK et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2017cv02608
Petitioner:
WILLIAM LEAK
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEAKE v. ANDERSON et al
as 2:2011cv04014
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEAKE
Defendant:
ANDERSON and WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEAKE v. DILLMAN
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2010cv07406
Petitioner:
RICKY LEAKE
Respondent:
JEFFREY N. DILLMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMPSON et al v. WILLIAMS et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2009cv01432
Plaintiff:
JAMES S. THOMPSON, EUNICE THOMPSON LEAKE and DAVID LEAKE
Defendant:
WILLIAMS, UNKNOWN FEMALE PROBATION OFFICER, FAYETTE COUNTY ADULT PROBATION OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON et al v. HOWARD et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2009cv01416
Plaintiff:
JAMES S. THOMPSON, RAE LYNN SIGWALT, MRS. RICH CHECK and others
Defendant:
NORMAN HOWARD, ROY MEHALIK, REDSTONE TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.