Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Gu v. Chen et al
as 1:2024cv04612
Plaintiff:
Feifei Gu
Defendant:
Hang Chen, Emily Hui Chen-Liang, Susana Chong Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Baxter et al
as 1:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Chad S. Williams
Defendant:
Todd K. Baxter, Matt Vanduzee, James E. Walsh, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Martuscello et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jesse James
Defendant:
Daniel Martuscello, III, Anthony Annucci, Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maes et al v. Hochul et al
as 1:2024cv01404
Plaintiff:
Mourad Karim Maes and John Allen Ricks
Defendant:
Kathleen Hochul, Letitia James and Sandra Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yanez v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Marvin Yanez
Respondent:
Mark Miller and Ms. Letitia James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grosse-Rhode v. James et al
as 9:2023cv01474
Plaintiff:
Keir A. Grosse-Rhode and Anthony Grosse-Rhode
Defendant:
Ms. Letitia James and Daniel F. Martuscello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Echevarria v. Tejada et al
as 1:2023cv07670
Plaintiff:
Edwin Echevarria
Defendant:
Charles J. Tejada and Letitia James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv00720
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Kathlee C. Hochul, Letitia James, Ann Marie T. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. James
as 6:2022cv06496
Petitioner:
Bobby Reed and Bobby Reid
Respondent:
Letitia James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Granados v. NYS DOCCS et al
as 1:2022cv08804
Plaintiff:
Delia Granados
Defendant:
NYS DOCCS, Lucy Lang, Anthony Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
