Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Maye v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02222
Petitioner: Dashawn Maye
Respondent: Unnamed Respondent and State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Maye v. Pee Wee et al
as 5:2022ct03439
Plaintiff: Eddie R. Maye
Defendant: Pee Wee, Dutch and V-Love Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maye v. McKinney
as 5:2022ct03438
Plaintiff: Eddie R. Maye
Defendant: Antonio McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maye v. Mckinney We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00647
Plaintiff: Eddie R Maye
Defendant: Antonio Mckinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. BIRKHEAD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00006
Defendant: SGT. CLARK, SGT. D. WILLIAMS, OFC. BRUGGEST/BRUGEST and others
Plaintiff: DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith-Bey v. Mayes et al
as 5:2015ct03048
Plaintiff: Robert A. Smith-Bey
Defendant: Ronald Mayes, Mr. Garner, Mrs. Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith-Bey v. Mayes et al
as 5:2015ct03035
Plaintiff: Robert A. Smith-Bey
Defendant: Ronald Mayes, Officer Harrison, Nurse Cullins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith-Bey v. Washington et al
as 5:2015ct03034
Plaintiff: Robert A. Smith-Bey
Defendant: Oliver Washington, Ronald Mayes, Mrs. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carawan v. McLarty et al
as 5:2014ct03079
Plaintiff: William C. Carawan, Jr.
Defendant: John McLarty, Ronald Mayes, C/O Sledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorne v. Henderson et al
as 5:2013ct03180
Plaintiff: Michael Thorne
Defendant: Roshanna Henderson, Ronald Mayes and N.C. Dept. of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?