Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fouts v. Houlton et al
as 3:2023cv05594
Plaintiff:
Nathan Bradley Fouts
Defendant:
Dion, Medical Director, Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fouts v. Inslee et al
as 3:2023cv05565
Plaintiff:
Nathan Bradley Fouts
Defendant:
Jay Inslee, State of Washington, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos et al v. John Doe DOC Medical Director et al
as 4:2017cv05120
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr. and The Society of T.R.U.T.H.
Defendant:
John Doe DOC Medical Director, Frank John Smith, Jon Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos et al v. John Doe DOC Medical Director et al
as 2:2017cv01079
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos and The Society of T.R.U.T.H.
Defendant:
John Doe DOC Medical Director, Frank John Smith, Jon Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv05129
Plaintiff:
Keith Adair Davis
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, G Hammond, ADA Coordinator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Washington State Penitentiary et al
as 2:2008cv05084
Plaintiff:
James Lee Baker
Defendant:
Washington State Penitentiary, Sinclair, Mark A Kucza and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Benson v. Pierce County Jail et al
as 3:2008cv05407
Plaintiff:
Dwight Benson
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail and Pierce County Medical Director
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kelly v. Holtgeerts et al
as 2:2008cv00261
Plaintiff:
James Kelly
Defendant:
Reed Holtgeerts and King County Jail Medical Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Pierce County Jail et al
as 3:2007cv05153
Plaintiff:
Hillary Walls
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail, Chief of Corrections, Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
