Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Harper v. Peterson et al
as 5:2023cv02998
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Harper
Defendant:
Mark Peterson, Mary Knox, Joe Reposa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Harper v. Peterson et al
as 3:2023cv02998
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Harper
Defendant:
Mark Peterson, Mary Knox, Joe Reposa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Harper v. Peterson et al
as 1:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Harper
Defendant:
Mark Peterson, Mary Knox, Joe Reposa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Adodojaji et al
as 4:2018cv04582
Defendant:
Kabu Adodojaji and Mark Peterson
Plaintiff:
Henry Desean Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Livingston et al
as 4:2017cv00327
Plaintiff:
Henry Desean Adams
Defendant:
David O. Livingston, Mark Peterson, Robin Lipetzky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 4:2016cv07130
Petitioner:
Jose U. Padilla
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Torres v. Saba et al
as 3:2016cv06607
Plaintiff:
Mario Torres
Defendant:
Natalie Saba, Kira Murray, Christopher Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Contra Costa County et al
as 3:2015cv01456
Petitioner:
Larry Lee Russell , Jr.
Respondent:
Contra Costa County, Mark Peterson, Thomas A. Maddock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Russell v. Peterson et al
as 3:2014cv05291
Petitioner:
Larry L. Russell, Jr.
Respondent:
Mark Peterson, Scott Cunnane, Ellen McDonnell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Milwaukee Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv00909
Plaintiff:
Octavius Jordan
Defendant:
Milwaukee Police Department, Joseph W Merrill, Mark Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 75
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
