Cases 1 - 10 of 143
Roberson v. Fisher
as 4:2021cv00041
Respondent:
Commissioner Marshall Fisher
Petitioner:
Benjamin Roberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Saquing v. Mallett et al
as 3:2020cv00182
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Ronald Ellzy Woodall, Wexler Medical and others
Plaintiff:
John Milton Saquing
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hearron v. Irons et al
as 3:2019cv00031
Defendant:
Dr. Jefferson P. Maldonald, MDOC Parole Officer Barbara Clark, Lt. Williams and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Khristoffer Mandell Hearron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Bryant et al
as 1:2018cv00152
Plaintiff:
David Gray
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Jim Hood, Brian Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wedgeworth v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2017cv00730
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, M.D.O.C., Christopher B. Epps and others
Plaintiff:
Wiley Wedgeworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huskey v. Fisher et al
as 1:2017cv00140
Plaintiff:
Matthew Huskey
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Gloria Perry, Dennis Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Fisher et al
as 4:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
Clyde Wendell Smith
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Fisher et al
as 2:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Harris
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watts v. Pickett et al
as 5:2017cv00038
Plaintiff:
Carl Watts
Defendant:
Unknown Pickett, Marshall Fisher, Jerry William and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00101
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Bates
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Centurion of Mississippi, Inc., Marshall Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
