Cases 1 - 10 of 239
Shelton v. Russ et al
as 5:2024ct03085
Plaintiff:
Andre C. Shelton
Defendant:
Nicholas A. Russ, Dare County Detention Center, Marshall H. Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rouse v. Godfrey et al
as 5:2024ct03115
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lindell Rouse
Defendant:
John Godfrey, Marshall Pike, Cathy Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. State of NC et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Respondent:
NC Department of Adult Public Safety, State of NC, NC Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Marshall Lee Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marshall v. USA
as 3:2024cv00199
Petitioner:
Darris Dee Marshall
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haze v. Medical Provider et al
as 5:2023ct03300
Plaintiff:
Grant Ruffin Haze, III
Defendant:
Medical Provider, Nurse Jane Doe 1, Nurse Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL L. BROWN, JR.
Defendant:
TODD ISHEE, EDDIE BUFFALO, Sgt. A. ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Freeman et al
as 5:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
FNU Freeman, FNU Honeycutt, Joshua Sigmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Marshall et al
as 5:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
FNU Marshall, FNU Cox, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lunsford v. Jacob et al
as 5:2023ct03176
Plaintiff:
Jamel Tyree Lunsford
Defendant:
Warden Jacob, Warden Locklear, Todd E. Ishee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
