Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Maurice Walker, Sr. v. William Sperfslage
as 22-3093
Petitioner / Appellant:
Maurice Walker
Defendant / Appellee:
William Sperfslage
Walker v. Sperfslage
as 4:2019cv00185
Petitioner:
Maurice Walker, Sr.
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Defendant:
William Sperfslage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maurice Walker v. Dale White, et al
as 17-1345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Maurice Walker
Defendant:
Thomas R. Kane, Missouri Department of Corrections, George Lombardi and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Dale White and Unknown Amonds, Corrections Officer I
Walker v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv22835
Plaintiff:
Lavan Maurice Walker
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Walker v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv00796
Petitioner:
Andre Maurice Walker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Glass et al v. All Coffee County Deputies, Sheriffs, and Correctional Staff et al
as 4:2015cv00040
Plaintiff:
Keyvin Glass, Paul Fletcher and Maurice Walker
Defendant:
All Coffee County Deputies, Sheriffs, and Correctional Staff, State of TN, f/n/u Eldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glass et al v. All Coffee County Deputies, Sheriffs, and Correctional Staff et al
as 3:2015cv00651
Plaintiff:
Keyvin Glass, Paul Fletcher and Maurice Walker
Defendant:
All Coffee County Deputies, Sheriffs, and Correctional Staff, Tennessee, State of, f/n/u Eldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv24209
Plaintiff:
Lavan Maurice Walker
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Maurice Walker v. Mary Roche, et al
as 14-3353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Maurice Walker
Defendant - Appellee:
Mary Roche, Director of Office of Victim Programs, John Fayram, Warden and John Baldwin, Department of Corrections
Walker v. Roche et al
as 1:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
Maurice Walker
Defendant:
Mary Roche, John Fayram and John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
