Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Neeley v. Goodyear, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02319
Plaintiff:
Marshun Neeley
Defendant:
Goodyear, City of, Goodyear Police Department, Santiago Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mejia v. Gutierrez
as 4:2023cv00107
Petitioner:
Ivan Mejia
Respondent:
Unknown Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mejia v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2022cv00389
Plaintiff:
Ivan Mejia
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, S Waite and Nader Moinfar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mejia-Perez #221054 v. Centurion of Arizona LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00896
Plaintiff:
Eric De Jesus Mejia-Perez
Defendant:
Centurion of Arizona LLC, Siji Thomas, David Shinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montgomery v. Mazzei et al
as 4:2020cv00244
Defendant:
Unknown Mattes, Unknown Picone, Unknown Farris and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lee Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
High v. Pima County Jail et al
as 4:2018cv00474
Defendant:
Unknown Lariza, Arizona, State of, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Lee High, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mejia v. Cavalry Portfolio Services LLC
as 2:2018cv00313
Plaintiff:
Alexis A Mejia
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2017cv04180
Plaintiff:
David Mejia Sanchez
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Paul Penzone, Fulton Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez #147145 v. Encinas et al
as 2:2017cv01825
Defendant:
Unknown Encinas, Ruth Tenierro, Christine M Salas and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Javier Lovitt Zeta Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mejia v. Hacker-Agnew et al
as 2:2017cv00909
Petitioner:
Jaime Mejia
Respondent:
Carla Hacker-Agnew and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
