Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
BROWN v. ODDO et al
as 2:2024cv00226
Petitioner: MARVIN LYLE BROWN
Respondent: WARDEN LEMAR ODDO, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HUGHSTON v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2023cv03354
Petitioner: KENJAH HUGHSTON
Respondent: UNITED STATES, WARDEN MCGEE and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02733
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
FORD v. GARLAND et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02393
Plaintiff: HENRY FORD
Defendant: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ERIC S. GARTNER, RONALD L. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. WHITMER et al
as 2:2022cv02046
Petitioner: ROBERT ANDREW REED and ROBERT ANDREW BEY
Respondent: CHRIS WHITMER, UNITED STATES PAROLE BOARD AGENCY, UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WILEY v. US GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2022cv00707
Plaintiff: DANA W. WILEY
Defendant: US GOVERNMENT, ASSIST. SUPER. WILLIAM BARR, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. U.S. PAROLE BOARD AGENCY et al
as 2:2022cv00546
Petitioner: ROBERT ANDREW REED doing business as ROBERT ANDREW REED
Respondent: U.S. PAROLE BOARD AGENCY, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA doing business as DIR OF THE U.S. PAROLE BOARD, ERICK HELENIHI doing business as U.S. PAROLE EXAMINER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01986
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?