Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Carroll v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2023cv00874
Plaintiff:
Omar Michael Carroll, III
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Oregon Board of Parole and Oregon Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Lucas et al
as 2:2021cv00551
Plaintiff:
Michael Carroll
Defendant:
Alan Lucas, John Doe 2 and John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Pierce County Sheriffs Department et al
as 3:2020cv05290
Defendant:
Pierce County Sheriffs Department and Michael Carroll
Plaintiff:
Michael Perry Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adefeyinti v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2019cv04997
Defendant:
Michael Carroll, United States Postal Service and State of Illinois
Plaintiff:
Adekunle Adefeyinti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GILBERT v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 0:2017cv62084
Plaintiff:
CRAIG IVAN GILBERT
Defendant:
Robert Gibson, State of Florida, Ari Porth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GILBERT v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2017cv00234
Petitioner:
CRAIG IVAN GILBERT
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA, MICHAEL CARROL, BROWARD COUNTY JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael Carroll v. Kelsey Stewart, et al
as 17-35419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CARROLL
Defendant - Appellee:
KELSEY STEWART, CCO2, JILL M. CHAMBERLIN, Individually and as well as in her official capacity as a CCS, JUAN JOSE HERNANDEZ, Individually and as well as in his official capacity as a CCO and others
Evans v. Bredehoft et al
as 4:2016cv00750
Plaintiff:
Quentin Lee Evans
Defendant:
Jason Bredehoft and Michael Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Carroll v. Jeffrey Wood
as 16-2581
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL CARROLL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY WOODS, Warden
Carroll v. Stewart et al
as 3:2015cv05170
Plaintiff:
Michael Carroll
Defendant:
Kelsey Stewart and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
