Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Andrews #357214 v. NaphCare et al
as 2:2023cv02689
Plaintiff:
Ann Andrews
Defendant:
NaphCare, Ryan Thornell, Gemini John and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Escobar v. Irby et al
as 2:2023cv02082
Plaintiff:
Michael D Escobar
Defendant:
Irene Barron Irby, Unknown Rushing, Unknown Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Mullet v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv01902
Petitioner:
Michael Duane Mullet and Michael D Mullet
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Escobar v. Irby et al
as 2:2023cv01740
Plaintiff:
Michael D Escobar
Defendant:
Irene Barron Irby, Unknown Navarro, Unknown Raymer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
McFarland #036919 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00325
Petitioner:
Michael D McFarland
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gemma v. Medrano et al
as 4:2021cv00167
Defendant:
A Medrano and Unknown Othon
Plaintiff:
Michael D Gemma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv01384
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Ornelas and J Guerena
Plaintiff:
Michael D Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorning v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv04910
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joseph M Arpaio and Vincent Companaro
Plaintiff:
Michael D Thorning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gemma v. Shartle et al
as 4:2019cv00382
Defendant:
R Villalva, Unknown Smythe, Unknown Madrid and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D Gemma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. New Mexico, State of et al
as 2:2019cv04641
Defendant:
New Mexico Department of Public Safety NCIC CJIS, Evangeline Echols, Michelle Lujan Grisham and others
Plaintiff:
Cheri Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
