Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Ballou v. Kenney et al
as 4:2015cv03106
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Ballou
Defendant:
Michelle Capps, Rosalyn Cotton, Does 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell Pittman v. Michael Kenney, et al
as 15-1997
Petitioner - Appellant:
Russell S. Pittman
Respondent - Appellee:
Michael L. Kenney and Scott Frakes
Deas v. Kenney et al
as 8:2015cv00035
Defendant:
Kevin Bergstrom, Kieth Broadfoot, Brian Gage and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Deas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delgado v. Kenney
as 8:2014cv00402
Petitioner:
Henry Delgado
Respondent:
Michael L. Kenney
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephen Cavanaugh v. Michael Kenney, et al
as 14-3613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stephen Cavanaugh
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael L. Kenney, Frank Hopkins, Diane Sabatka-Rhine and others
Hessler v. Kenney
as 8:2014cv00357
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Hessler
Respondent:
Michael L. Kenney
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sather v. Kenney et al
as 8:2014cv00350
Defendant:
Director of NDCS
Et.al:
Michael L. Kenney
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Sather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Kenney
as 4:2014cv03197
Petitioner:
Lloyd E. Allen
Respondent:
Michael L. Kenney
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lawrence Ortiz v. Michael Kenney
as 14-2629
Petitioner - Appellant:
Lawrence Ortiz
Respondent - Appellee:
Michael L. Kenney
Pittman v. Kenney
as 4:2014cv03096
Respondent:
Michael L. Kenney
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Russell S. Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
