Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Swygart v. Warden
as 1:2022cv00240
Petitioner:
Michael P Swygart
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Singh v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 3:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Michael Phillip Singh and Michael P Singh
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail, John T Boyd, Al Ott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heffern v. Marthakis et al
as 3:2018cv00881
Defendant:
Marthakis, Dan, Lacy and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D Heffern and Michael P Heffern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEFFERN v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2017cv00410
Respondent:
DICK BROWN and STATE OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
MICHAEL P. HEFFERN
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WEAVER v. MICHAEL
as 2:2017cv00118
Defendant:
MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Plaintiff:
SHAYNE WEAVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BELL v. EWING
as 2:2014cv00090
Petitioner:
GRAYLON D. BELL
Respondent:
GREG EWING and MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELL v. EWING
as 2:2014cv00091
Petitioner:
GRAYLON D. BELL
Respondent:
GREG EWING and MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELL v. EWING
as 2:2014cv00086
Petitioner:
GRAYLON D. BELL
Respondent:
GREG EWING and MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELL v. EWING
as 2:2014cv00088
Petitioner:
GRAYLON D. BELL
Respondent:
GREG EWING and MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELL v. EWING
as 2:2014cv00087
Petitioner:
GRAYLON D. BELL
Respondent:
GREG EWING and MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
