Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Jose Peroza-Benitez v. Darren Smith, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1390
Defendant: NICHOLAS EPOLITO and OFFICER DANIEL WHITE
Defendant / Appellee: C.I. MICHAEL PERKINS, C.I. KEVIN HASER and C.I. DARREN C. SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSE ANTONIO PEROZA-BENITEZ
Perkins v. Talton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv09562
Defendant: Correction Officer Talton
Plaintiff: Michael Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Previl
as 1:2019cv09333
Defendant: Previl
Plaintiff: Michael Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2019cv06606
Defendant: Thomas Dart
Plaintiff: Michael Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Annucci et al
as 1:2018cv02986
Plaintiff: Michael Perkins
Defendant: Anthony J. Annucci, T. Finerow, R. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEROZA-BENITEZ v. SMITH et al
as 5:2017cv03980
Defendant: C.I. MICHAEL PERKINS, C.I. NICHOLAS EPOLITO, C.I. DANIEL WHITE and others
Plaintiff: JOSE ANTONIO BENITEZ-PEROZA and JOSE ANTONIO PEROZA-BENITEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. New York City et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00423
Defendant: P.O. Jackson, P.O. John Doe 1, P.O. John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff: Michael Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Usher
as 1:2016cv03379
Plaintiff: Michael Perkins
Defendant: C. Usher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Perkins v. Gary Swarthout, et al
as 13-16796
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL PERKINS
Respondent - Appellee: GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden and BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS
Perkins v. Swarthout, et al., We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00931
Petitioner: Michael Perkins
Respondent: Gary Swarthout and Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?