Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Engles v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv01259
Plaintiff:
Jessie Engles and Jesse Engles
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Brian Fisher, Diane Van Buren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson et al v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Rodrick L. Richardson, Charles Low, Walter Christian and others
Defendant:
Sheriff John T. Wilcher, Chatham County Superior Courts, Georgia Public Defender Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Engles v. Annucci et al
as 6:2022cv06380
Plaintiff:
Jessie Engles
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Brian Fisher, Diane Van Buren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Sheahan
as 6:2019cv06529
Respondent:
Superintendant Michael Sheahan
Petitioner:
Joseph Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sheard v. Sheahan, et al
as 6:2018cv06553
Defendant:
H. Martin, Michael Sheahan and S. King
Plaintiff:
David Sheard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Sheahan
as 18-1694
Petitioner - Appellant:
Patrick Hughes
Respondent - Appellee:
Michael Sheahan, Superintendent; Five Points Correctional Facility
Bonano v. Sheahan et al
as 6:2018cv06405
Plaintiff:
Michael Bonano
Defendant:
Michael Sheahan, Kevin L. Signor, Bart E. Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. Sheahan
as 18-1673
Petitioner - Appellant:
Raynell Burgess
Respondent - Appellee:
Superintendent Michael Sheahan
Sheard v. State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2018cv00596
Defendant:
H. Martin, M. Kopp, David Howard and others
Plaintiff:
David Sheard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick v. Murphy
as 18-1352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Frederick
Defendant - Appellee:
Patrick Murphy, Officer, Michael Robyck, Officer, Jamie Robinson, Officer and others
Defendant:
Anthony Hicks, Officer and Michael Sheahan, Acting Superintendent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
