Cases 1 - 10 of 10
GREENE v. COUNTY OF DURHAM OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2014cv00153
Plaintiff:
ALONZO GREENE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF DURHAM OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, WORTH L. HILLS, MINOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREENE v. COUNTY OF DURHAM OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2013cv01142
Plaintiff:
ALONZO GREENE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF DURHAM OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, WORTH L. HILLS, MINOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Vaughn et al
as 5:2013ct03272
Plaintiff:
Jamey L. Wilkins
Defendant:
Mr. Vaughn, Mr. Waddell, Mr. Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2012cv00102
Plaintiff:
SHMIR AL-MIN MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, THOMAS J. KEITH, JENNIFER MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BURGESS v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2011cv00316
Plaintiff:
ALBERT C. BURGESS, JR.
Defendant:
DAVID B. WILLIAMS, JAMIE MINOR, EQUITY BASED SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson v. Minor et al
as 5:2010hc02185
Petitioner:
Warren C. Wilson
Respondent:
Jonathan Minor and U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Minor v. Stephens et al
as 5:2010hc02184
Petitioner:
Eric J. Minor
Respondent:
Warden Stephens, United States Department of Justice and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wilson v. Minor
as 5:2010hc02167
Petitioner:
James L. Wilson
Respondent:
Jonathan Minor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MINOR v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2010cv00578
Petitioner:
ERIC J. MINOR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jenkins v. Minor et al
as 5:2009hc02112
Petitioner:
Edward Jenkins
Respondent:
Jonathan Minor and U.S. Parole Comm.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
