Cases 1 - 10 of 21
JOHNSON v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
TRAVON JOHNSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, GUSTATSON, MAJOR ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Montour v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01376
Petitioner:
Jimmy Montour
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tyler Montour v. Cathy Jess
as 22-2393
Petitioner / Appellant:
TYLER MONTOUR, now known as TYLER GONZALES
Respondent / Appellee:
CATHY JESS
Galutia et al v. County et al
as 1:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Dannelle Galutia
Defendant:
Columbia County, George Nye, Officer Lorson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. CROWTHER et al
as 1:2020cv00337
Defendant:
MICHELLE CROWTHER, FACILITY MANAGER OVERMYER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MENTEER and others
Plaintiff:
MUSTAFA WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
Montour v. Jess
as 1:2019cv01604
Respondent:
Dylon Radtke and Cathy A Jess
Petitioner:
Tyler A Montour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Montour v. Uhler
as 2:2019cv02242
Petitioner:
Rudy Montour
Respondent:
Donald Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Montour v. Uhler
as 2:2019cv00009
Petitioner:
Rudy Montour
Respondent:
Donald Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hyde v. Warden of Montour County Jail
as 4:2016cv00590
Plaintiff:
Walter Hyde
Defendant:
Warden of Montour County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Living Soul Chief Asan Manuel Mustafah Fearce W. Yazoo v. Federal Court Defendants et al
as 1:2015cv00446
Petitioner:
Living Soul Chief Asan Manuel Mustafah Fearce W. Yazoo
Respondent:
Federal Court Defendants, State of Pennsylvania Defendants, Philadelphia Municipal Court Defendants and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
