Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Johnson v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Cheyanne Clark, Mark Shepherd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McPherson v. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 3:2023cv00544
Petitioner:
McPherson
Respondent:
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Padilla v. Dallas Co et al
as 3:2022cv01052
Plaintiff:
Ismael H. Padilla
Defendant:
City, Town or Municipality of Dallas Co, Greg Abbott, Lana Mcdaniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Texas Prison System et al
as 3:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Texas Prison System, University of Texas, US District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02014
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Banks v. Forbes et al
as 3:2017cv00847
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Kelly Forbes, United States Marshals Service, Mark Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Style v. Maguire et al
as 3:2017cv00502
Defendant:
James Maguire, John Doe, Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Lenworth Style
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. US Secretary of Defense
as 3:2013cv00045
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
US Secretary of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Montgomery v. Baird et al
as 3:2011cv01354
Petitioner:
Kimberly Montgomery
Respondent:
Maureen Baird, Grand Prairie and US Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lage v. Chapdelaine et al
as 3:2010cv01030
Petitioner:
Valdir Lage
Respondent:
Carole Chapdelaine, US Attorney and Attorney Gen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
