Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Fontenot v. July et al
as 4:2021cv00445
Defendant:
Dr. Ernestinen July, M.D., Chidinma Onuigbo, Dr. Betty J Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Chester Gerard Fontenot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cargill v. CMC Pharmacy et al
as 4:2020cv03605
Defendant:
CMC Pharmacy, Betty Williams, Mark A Barber and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Clint Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Clayton et al
as 4:2020cv02778
Defendant:
Dr Edgar Hulipas, NP T Tran, Dr B Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Elliot B West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tracy August v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 15-1513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACY AUGUST
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA CARUSO, Director of MDOC, ROBERT LACY, Doctor, MICHAEL SZYMANSKI, Doctor and others
Onuigbo v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv00734
Petitioner:
Ogechukwu Onuigbo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
August v. Caruso et al
as 2:2012cv13775
Plaintiff:
Tracy August
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Daniel Heyns, Millicent Warren and others
Allen v. Shawney et al
as 1:2011cv10942
Plaintiff:
Charmel Allen
Defendant:
Shawney, C. Stovall, Yukins and others
Ruud #214472 v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00648
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Ruud #214472
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Unknown Onuigbo, George J. Pramstaller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruud v. Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2010cv12204
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ruud
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated, Onuigbo, George J Pramstaller and others
Tipton #254693 v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00421
Plaintiff:
Leonza Tipton #254693
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Maureen Onuigbo, Keith Ivens and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
