Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Osborne v. USA
as 5:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Pamela Ladawn Councill Osborne
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
England v. Oniya et al
as 5:2024ct03006
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David England
Defendant:
O. Oniya, D. Windley, J. Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Osborne et al
as 5:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Acquilla Booze Cain, Jr.
Defendant:
M. Osborne and FNU Sidburry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarvis v. Iredell County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
William T Jarvis
Defendant:
Iredell County Detention Center, Travis Ward, John Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cain v. Osborne et al
as 5:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Acquilla Booze Cain, Jr.
Defendant:
M. Osborne, FNU Sidberry, FNU Canter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett, Jr. v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03262
Plaintiff:
Osborne Parnell Bennett, Jr.
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Eddie Buffaloe Jr., State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James et al v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03237
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James, Larry Robinson, Anthony Michael Finney and others
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Eddie Buffaloe Jr., State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hefner v. Jones et al
as 1:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Hefner
Defendant:
Johnathan Heath Jones, Kimberly Osborne-Evans, Sylva Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osborne v. United States of America
as 5:2020ct03094
Plaintiff:
Wesley C. Osborne, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OSBORNE v. USA
as 1:2019cv00565
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
TYRONE DEMOND OSBORNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
