Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lawson v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2019cv00016
Petitioner:
Paul Eugene Lawson
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Paul Lawson v. William Stephens, et al
as 18-10877
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL EUGENE LAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, Director, TDCJ-CID, UNKNOWN, Custodian of Offender Records, VICKIE BARROWS, Director of Access to Courts and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00064
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Paul Lawson v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-10283
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL EUGENE LAWSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Lawson v. Director TDCJ - CID
as 7:2016cv00138
Petitioner:
Paul Eugene Lawson
Respondent:
Director TDCJ - CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lawson v. Stephens et al
as 7:2015cv00173
Plaintiff:
Paul Eugene Lawson
Defendant:
William Stephens, Custodian of Offender Records, Access to Courts Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Stephens et al
as 5:2015cv01089
Defendant:
Access to Courts Director, Christopher Brantly, Custodian of Offender Records and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Eugene Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DORSEY v. ASHELY et al
as 3:2015cv00521
Plaintiff:
LEONARD E DORSEY
Defendant:
LARRY R ASHELY, PAUL A LAWSON, STEFEN V VOVGHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. ASHLEY
as 3:2015cv00462
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO D PAYNE
Defendant:
LARRY R ASHLEY, PAUL E LAWSON, STEFAN W VAUGHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORTUNE v. LAWSON et al
as 3:2013cv00028
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WAYNE FORTUNE
Defendant:
PAUL A LAWSON, MORASCH and SOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
