Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Bruner v. LCRF Law Library Staff
as 5:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Paul Lawrence Bruner
Defendant:
LCRF Law Library Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruner v. United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
as 5:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Paul Lawrence Bruner
Defendant:
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bruner v. Lawton Correctional Rehabilitation Facility Staff
as 5:2022cv01104
Plaintiff:
Paul Lawrence Bruner
Defendant:
Lawton Correctional Rehabilitation Facility Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruner v. Cleveland County Courthouse et al
as 5:2022cv01031
Plaintiff:
Paul Lawrence Bruner
Defendant:
Cleveland County Courthouse and LCRF Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bruner v. LCRF Inmate Trust Fund Staff
as 5:2022cv01030
Plaintiff:
Paul Lawrence Bruner
Defendant:
LCRF Inmate Trust Fund Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett (ID 86695) v. Wichita Police Department, City of et al
as 5:2022cv03187
Plaintiff:
Paul Lawrence Barnett
Defendant:
Wichita Police Department, City of, Amy McCowen and Kenneth Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett (ID 86695) v. Schnurr et al
as 5:2018cv03220
Defendant:
Leo C. Duran and Dan Schnurr
Plaintiff:
Paul Lawrence Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Washington v. Warden Chandler
as 17-10435
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL LAWRENCE WASHINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN CHANDLER
Washington v. Warden Chandler
as 6:2017cv00022
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Paul Lawrence Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Washington v. Warden Chandler
as 4:2017cv00004
Petitioner:
Paul Lawrence Washington
Respondent:
Warden Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
