Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Mumin v. Case Manager Carroll et al
as 8:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Dukhan Mumin
Defendant:
Case Manager Carroll, Shaun Settles, Case Worker Moeshoeshoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welch v. Peterson et al
as 4:2024cv03009
Plaintiff:
Brendan Welch
Defendant:
Jacob Peterson, Officer S. Wolf, Officer Hawken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson v. USA
as 8:2023cv00209
Petitioner:
Nicole Peterson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Valentine v. Gable et al
as 8:2023cv00008
Petitioner:
Daejerron L. Valentine
Respondent:
Craig Gable and Douglas Peterson
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bronson v. Peterson et al
as 8:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
Clyde Bronson
Defendant:
Doug Peterson, Gary B. Randall, James Mastellar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. USA
as 4:2022cv03240
Petitioner:
Steven G. Peterson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robinson v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Ricketts, Doug Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ravestein v. Douglas County, Nebraska et al
as 8:2021cv00442
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Douglas County, Nebraska, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Colleen Ravestein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petersen v. Peterson et al
as 8:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Aryan Petersen
Defendant:
Shane Peterson, II and Hadid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gatus v. Peterson et al
as 8:2021cv00380
Plaintiff:
DeRon D. Gatus
Defendant:
Shane Peterson, II, Steven Rose, Steven Gillot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
