Cases 1 - 10 of 71
KING v. WALKER et al
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
SHAWN KING
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT TINA WALKER, MR. MATIYASIC, RHONDA HOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
BRYANT YOUNG
Defendant:
SECRETARY DR. LAUREL HARRY, SECRETARY GEORGE LITTLE, DEPUTY SECRETARY T. FERGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PALSON v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv01941
Plaintiff:
COREY D. PALSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT M. ZAKEN, S. BUZAS, SECURITY C.O. I T. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. SCI Dallas, et al
as 3:2023cv00214
In Re:
ANDY ORTIZ
Defendant:
M. Sopata, A. A. Smith, D. Mull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. SPAGEL et al
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD SPAGEL, OFFICER PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Shenk et al
as 3:2022cv01601
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Warden Travis Shenk, Deputy Warden Michael Eickhoff, Corporal Hrnjic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PALMER v. PAROLE BOARD
as 1:2022cv00223
Petitioner:
PHILIP E. PALMER
Respondent:
PAROLE BOARD and SUPERINTENDENT LONNIE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MASSAQUOI v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS, MAUREEN MALANOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Palmer v. USA
as 1:2021cv01349
Petitioner:
Erik Palmer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
KRIES et al v. PALMER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2021cv03321
Plaintiff:
AUGUST B. KREIS, IV and AUGUST BYRON KREIS, IV
Defendant:
PALMER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT NUMBER, EVAN GOLDSTIEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
