Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Abdullah-Malik v. Cathy et al
as 3:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Nafis Akeem Alim Abdullah Malik and Nafis Akeem-Alim Abdullah-Malik
Defendant:
Eddie Cathy, FNU Rogers, FNU Pursor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. DURHAM COUNTY DET. FACILITY et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT PEELE, ARAMARK, MAJOR E. BAZMORE and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY et al
as 1:2020cv01158
Defendant:
ARMARK (DURHAM COMMISSARY), PAM, DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2019cv00590
Plaintiff:
OCTAVIOUS JOHNSON
Defendant:
NURSE H. SAMPSON, ELAINE M. DIMICCO, PAM LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTS v. ARMENTIA et al
as 1:2019cv00582
Defendant:
WILLIAM BULLARD, SARAH MCLUCUS, PAM LOCKLEAR and others
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON W. BATTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTS v. ARMENTA et al
as 1:2019cv00557
Defendant:
WILLIAM BULLARD, PAM LOCKER, SARAH MCLUCAS and others
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON W. BATTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. SAMPSON et al
as 1:2019cv00526
Plaintiff:
OCTAVIOUS JOHNSON
Defendant:
NURSE R. ROBERSON, P.A. ELAINE M. DIMICCO, PAM LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLARY v. POOLE et al
as 1:2019cv00222
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, KATY POOLE and PAM LOCKLEAR
Plaintiff:
RONALD MCCLARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickens v. Perry et al
as 5:2016ct03189
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Pickens
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, Robeson County, Brad Perritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickens v. Perry et al
as 5:2016ct03141
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Pickens
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, W.D. Guice, George T. Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
