Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Howard v. Young et al
as 7:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
James Young, Drew Wade, Andrew C Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2023cv00773
Petitioner:
Carlese J. Hall
Respondent:
Charles Williams, Arcola Washington-Adduci, Patricia V Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Syling v. Neely
as 7:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Patricia Syling
Respondent:
Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Calloway (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dwight Jones
Defendant:
Kim Willingham, Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Terry Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kasali v. Bradley
as 7:2023cv00080
Petitioner:
Lola Shalewa Barbara Kasali
Respondent:
Warden Patricia V. Bradley, Kimberly Neely, Michael Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jacobs-EL v. Demos
as 5:2021cv01485
Plaintiff:
Hakim Jacobs-EL
Defendant:
Hon. Patricia Dunn Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barefield v. Dunn et al
as 2:2020cv00917
Defendant:
Arnaldo Mercado, Kay Ivey, Jacob R. Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barefield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGuire-Mollica v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The et al
as 7:2020cv01768
Defendant:
Chad Garrett, Medley, Shoulders and others
Plaintiff:
Terri McGuire-Mollica
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01717
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Ms Shoulders, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and others
Petitioner:
Shareka Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McGuire-Mollica v. Bradley
as 7:2020cv01672
Respondent:
Patricia V Bradley
Petitioner:
Terri McGuire-Mollica
Defendant:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
