Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Earwood v. Linn County Correctional Center et al
as 1:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
James Adam Earwood
Defendant:
Linn County Correctional Center, Pete Wilson, Kent Steenblock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Dunigan v. Raybon Johnson, et al
as 22-56152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN W. DUNIGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYBON C. JOHNSON, Warden, CSPA LA COUNTY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Kevin Dunigan v. Raybon C. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv07216
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dunigan
Defendant:
Raybon C. Johnson, C.S.P. LA County, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Dunigan v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01713
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dunigan
Defendant:
Raybon C. Johnson, C.S.P. LA County, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Gardner et al
as 1:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Ethan Lee Palmer
Defendant:
Brian Gardner, Pete Wilson, Patrick Reinert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Gardner et al
as 1:2019cv00086
Defendant:
Pete Wilson, Nurse Kelly, Dr. Broksek and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Salvador Alvarado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sousley v. Linn County Correctional Center et al
as 1:2019cv00015
Defendant:
Matt Sandvick, Pete Wilson, Kent Steenblock and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Daniel Sousley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Sharp v. King et al
as 1:2018cv01556
Defendant:
Brandon Price, Pete Wilson, Edmund G. Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Paramo
as 4:2017cv06399
Petitioner:
Pete Wilson
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Golden v. Wilson, et. al.
as 2:2016cv01746
Plaintiff:
Wayne Golden
Defendant:
Pete Wilson, Grey Davis, Arnold Schwarzeneggar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
