Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Laurence, Jr. v. Nerohna et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Norman Laurence, Jr.
Defendant:
Peter F Nerohna, Wayne T. Salisbury Jr., Rachel C. Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lastarza v. Neronha et al
as 1:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Lastarza
Defendant:
Peter F. Neronha and Patricia A. Coyne-Fague
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lucas
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Peter F. Nerhona, Wing Chau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Nicholson et al
as 1:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Samuel Diaz
Defendant:
Lauran Nicholson, Thomas Gulick, Maureen B Keough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vose v. Neronha
as 1:2023cv00084
Petitioner:
Carlton Vose
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney Peter Neronha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Peter F. Neronha
as 1:2021cv00416
Petitioner:
Samuel Diaz
Respondent:
Peter F. Neronha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Diaz v. State of Rhode Island et al.
as 1:2021cv00411
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Diaz
Defendant:
Attorney General Peter F. Neronha, Superior Court Mag. Richard Rospallo, Defense Attorney Thomas Gulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. McBurney et al
as 1:2021cv00048
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Silva
Defendant:
Richard Raspallo, U.S. Attorney Peter Neronha, Magistrate John F. McBurney, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Coyne-Fague, et al
as 1:2021cv00036
Plaintiff:
Peter A. Reynolds, Jr.
Defendant:
Nathan Estrela, Francis Thibert and Particia Coyne-Fague
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reynolds v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2020cv00489
Plaintiff:
Peter A. Reynolds, Jr.
Defendant:
Heather Daglier, Anthony Carvallo and Particia Coyne-Fague
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
