Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Peterson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02056
Petitioner:
Lowell Peterson
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Lauren May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PETERSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00195
Petitioner:
DEJOUR AIKE PETERSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Pettis v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Austin Devon Pettis
Defendant:
FNU Jones, FNU Smith, FNU Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Peterson et al
as 3:2022cv00581
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lamark Miller
Defendant:
D. Peterson, T. Snell, FNU Vitale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Harnett County Sheriff Department
as 5:2022ct03058
Plaintiff:
James R. Peterson
Defendant:
Harnett County Sheriff Department, Harnett County Detention Center and Crystal Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. USA
as 5:2021cv00202
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Steven Desmond Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Woodie et al v. McFadden et al
as 3:2021cv00068
Defendant:
Bennie Jones, Carl Cooper and Gary McFadden
Plaintiff:
Joshua J Peterson, Joseph Soldano, Edward Woodie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gayles v. State of North Carolina Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00125
Plaintiff:
Devon Armond Gayles and Devon A. Gayles El
Defendant:
Tracy Boone, Paul L. Maloney, Mary Malesky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv00013
Defendant:
SGT D. T. LENTZ, CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, T. N. BRANCH and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00745
Defendant:
RICHARD GOTTLIEB, SGT D. T. LENTZ, ELISABETH FROST DRESEL and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
