Cases 1 - 10 of 193
Butler v. Willson et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Christopher Butler
Defendant:
Jason Willson, Nathan Moore, Mr. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
Phillip Davis
Defendant:
A. Jones, Creghead and Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Jones
as 2:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Phillip Davis
Defendant:
A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. USA
as 4:2023cv00136
Petitioner:
Phillip Michael Bryant
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Robinson v. Punturi et al
as 1:2023cv01312
Petitioner:
Adrian Oneil Robinson
Respondent:
Kevin Punturi and K. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giles v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00519
Petitioner:
Phillip Michael Giles
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Sussex 1 State Prison Medical Department et al
as 1:2023cv00694
Plaintiff:
Phillip Morris Washington
Defendant:
Sussex 1 State Prison Medical Department, Lead Warden B. Cabell, Warden K. McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darr v. Stout et al
as 7:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
William Allen Darr, Jr.
Defendant:
C/O R. Stout, Harold W. Clarke and Warden Phillip White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardee v. Walz et al
as 3:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
John T. Hardee
Defendant:
Christopher Walz, John Doe Villanueva, Eric Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClanahan v. Johnson et al
as 7:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Nathanial Blake McClanahan
Defendant:
Honorable Patrick Johnson, Phillip Justice, Jr. and Pebbles Burgess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
