Cases 1 - 10 of 225
Poe v. Honey et al
as 2:2024cv00597
Defendant:
Randall Honey, Bart Mortenson and Jeff Mottishaw
Unknown:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Scott Poe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Poe v. Procture et al
as 2:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Scott Poe
Unknown:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Defendant:
FNU Owen, FNU Procture, FNU Melot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. CoreCivic et al
as 3:2024cv00932
Defendant:
f/n/u l/n/u, f/n/u Poe, CoreCivic and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poe v. Haynes et al
as 4:2024cv04103
Defendant:
. Stevenson, . Haynes, . DriFill and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Poe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baughman v. Bowman
as 24-40286
Plaintiff:
Steven Kurt Baughman
Defendant:
Jimmy Bowman, Warden, Powledge Unit, Vernon Mitchel, Assitant Warden, Powledge Unit, Ronnie Stanhope, Lieutenant, Powledge Unit and others
Poe v. Osmundson et al
as 4:2024cv04084
Plaintiff:
Joshua Poe
Defendant:
Kurt Osmundson, . Shinn and . Kramer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poe v. Vanwynsberg
as 4:2024cv04083
Plaintiff:
Joshua Poe
Defendant:
. Vanwynsberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. CoreCivic et al
as 3:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Joseph Norris
Defendant:
CoreCivic and Lorina Poe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Urena v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv01880
Plaintiff:
Amaury Urena
Defendant:
The City of New York, NYPD 48 Precinct, P.O. Aponte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poe v. Cogliati
as 5:2024cv00936
Plaintiff:
Brian Sheldon Poe
Defendant:
Syda K. Cogliati
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
