Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
SMITH et al v. BARR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00630
Defendant: T.J. WATSON, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, U.S. Attorney Genera WILLIAM P. BARR and others
Plaintiff: PATRICK R. SMITH and BRANDON S. HOLM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CHASE v. SMITH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00207
Respondent: BRIAN SMITH, J. R. SMITH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA and others
Petitioner: KENNETH CHASE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 3:2016cv00217
Miscellaneou: BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner: DANNY R. SMITH
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VANHORN v. STECKLER et al
as 2:2015cv00137
Miscellaneou: PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Defendant: J. R. SMITH and JOHN STECKLER
Plaintiff: WILLIAM VANHORN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANHORN et al v. LEMMON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00275
Defendant: ALL MAILROOM EMPLOYEES, HARLEY CRABB, TROY KEITH and others
Plaintiff: DARNELL CHIVERS and WILLIAM VANHORN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Superintendent
as 3:2010cv00116
Petitioner: Claudell R Smith
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv01589
Petitioner: MICHAEL R. SMITH
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv01497
Petitioner: MICHAEL R. SMITH
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SMITH v. KNIGHT
as 1:2008cv00835
Petitioner: EDDIE R. SMITH
Respondent: WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?