Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Fletcher v. Fox et al
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
James William Fletcher
Defendant:
Amira D. Fox, Robert Bowen and Kathleen A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Filing Error
as 5:2023cv00406
Petitioner:
robert bowen
Respondent:
Warden North Central Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowen v. Watson
as 5:2023cv00407
Petitioner:
Robert Bowen
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hairston v. Sparks et al
as 2:2022cv00579
Plaintiff:
Rico Isaih Hairston
Defendant:
Sparks, Theodore Jackson, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hairston v. Sparks et al
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Rico Isaih Hairston
Defendant:
Sparks, Theodore Jackson, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Bengami
as 3:2020cv00168
Respondent:
Thomas Bengami
Petitioner:
Nicholas Robert Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Krull v. Hassel et al
as 3:2019cv00881
Defendant:
Robert Bowen, Tami Napier and Matthew Hassel
Plaintiff:
Brian D Krull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dinwiddie v. Ossian Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv00138
Plaintiff:
Roy G Dinwiddie
Defendant:
Ossian Police Department, Stephanie Tucker, Wells County Department of Family and Children Services Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirkman v. Vermont Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00261
Petitioner:
Michael A. Kirkman
Respondent:
Vermont Department of Corrections , Andrew Pallito , Rose Jackman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowen v. Moya et al
as 1:2009cv00080
Plaintiff:
James Robert Bowen
Defendant:
NFN Moya, NFN Alexander and NFN Rowlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
