Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Roberto Hernandez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-11878
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERTO HERNANDEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Hernandez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv00066
Petitioner:
Roberto Hernandez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyree Ford v. Kevin Karnes, et al
as 22-14311
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYREE FORD
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN KARNES, NOELLE BRAMMIND, ROBERT NICHOLS and others
Hernandez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00585
Petitioner:
Roberto Hernandez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ford v. Karnes et al
as 2:2022cv00657
Plaintiff:
Tyree Ford
Defendant:
Kevin Karnes, Noelle Brammind, Robert Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyree Ford v. Roberto Hernandez, et al
as 22-13186
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYREE FORD
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERTO HERNANDEZ, City Manager, GERARDO OLIVIA, Attorney, KEVIN KARNES, Clerk of Court and others
Ford v. Hernandez et al
as 2:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
Tyree Ford
Defendant:
Roberto Hernandez, Gerardo Olivia, Kevin Karnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2020cv00293
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Roberto Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hernandez v. USA
as 5:2017cv00205
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Roberto Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lopez #286815 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv02474
Petitioner:
Roberto Hernandez Lopez
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
