Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Gresham #272603 v. Awomolo et al
as 1:2024cv00242
Defendant:
A. Awomolo, Double A, Unknown Shembarger and others
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Michael Gresham #272603
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dodd et al v. Zipfel et al
as 1:2022cv00994
Plaintiff:
Brandon C. Dodd and John/Jane Does
Defendant:
Mr. William Zipfel, Mr. William A. Sheron, Jr., Mr. Hoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rademaker v. Zanefauker et al
as 3:2021cv01757
Plaintiff:
David Rademaker
Defendant:
Dr. Zanefauker, PHD, Warden Covello, Q. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lamon v. Korte et al
as 3:2019cv03228
Defendant:
Stephen Bradshaw, Jeffrey Korte, Ryan Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lamon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rademaker v. Juarez et al
as 3:2018cv01831
Defendant:
A. Hernandez, R. Walker, B. Self and others
Plaintiff:
David Rademaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Rademaker v. Paramo et al
as 3:2017cv02406
Plaintiff:
David Rademaker
Defendant:
D. Paramo, G. Stratton, J. Juarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Powell v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 17-1262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director Michigan Department of Corrections, K. ROXANNE MCKEE, Deputy Director, THOMAS OSIER, Assistant Mental Health Director and others
Powell #484234 v. Washington et al
as 1:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
Michael Leon Powell #484234
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, K. McKee, Thomas Osier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Rademaker v. Daniel Paramo
as 14-56946
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID A. RADEMAKER
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL S. EVANS, Warden and DANIEL PARAMO, Warden
David Rademaker v. A. Hedgepeth, et al
as 11-17223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RADEMAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
A. HEDGEPETH, Warden, R. MACK, M.D., L. FOX, R.N. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
