Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Muhammad v. USA
as 4:2024cv02262
Petitioner:
Rasheed Abdullah Muhammad
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SMALLS v. North Charleston Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv01713
Plaintiff:
THERRAN RASHEED SMALLS
Defendant:
North Charleston Police Department, Officer Adams, Officer Jellico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. Florence County Sheriff's Dept et al
as 5:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Muhammad, Rasheed Abdullah Muhammad and James Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Florence County Sheriff's Dept, Florence County Detention Ctr and Ofc Ms McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Muhammad v. Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms
as 4:2023cv05961
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Abdullah Muhammad and James Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, Unknown Federal Agent and Horry County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Glover v. Jackson
as 8:2023cv03391
Petitioner:
Rasheed Tamir Glover
Respondent:
Shane Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Culler v. Lewis et al
as 2:2022cv03609
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Culler
Defendant:
Sheriff Duane Lewis, Berkeley County Sheriffs Office and Neil McSwain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Louallen v. USA
as 4:2016cv02627
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rasheed Theodore Louallen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brian Rashed Debnam v. J. Meeks
as 4:2015cv02939
Petitioner:
Brian Rasheed Debnam
Respondent:
J Meeks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Debnam v. Crews
as 4:2015cv00220
Petitioner:
Brian Rasheed Debnam
Respondent:
Mauriene Crews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Louallen v. USA
as 4:2011cv03372
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rasheed Theodore Louallen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
