Cases 1 - 10 of 723
Richards v. Shaffer et al
as 6:2024cv01153
Petitioner:
Timothy Jackson Richards
Respondent:
Scotty Shaffer and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. Houston County Jail (INMATE 3)
as 1:2024cv00496
Defendant:
Houston County Jail
Plaintiff:
Eddie J. Richards, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawton et al v. Houston County Jail
as 1:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Michael Geoghegan, Taurean Davis, Gregory Muise and others
Defendant:
Houston County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saxon v. Mobile Metro Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00257
Defendant:
Mobile Metro Jail and Chris Platt
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Saxon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. United States of America (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00745
Plaintiff:
Richard H. Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wilson v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv01757
Petitioner:
Richard L Wilson
Respondent:
Warden Williams and Hon. Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rives v. Hamm et al
as 4:2023cv01659
Petitioner:
Walter Richard Rives
Respondent:
John Q. Hamm, Phillip Mitchell and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramsey v. Horton
as 4:2023cv01309
Petitioner:
Richard L Ramsey
Respondent:
Sheriff Jonathon W Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
