Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Flores v. United States of America.
as 3:2016cv00250
Petitioner:
Richard Flores
Respondent:
United States of America.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Flores v. United States Of America
as 3:2015cv00074
Petitioner:
Richard Flores
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Flores v. United States of Amercia
as 3:2014cv00415
Petitioner:
Richard Flores
Respondent:
United States of Amercia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Belton v. Gacad et al
as 3:2013cv01375
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Belton, Sr.
Defendant:
Joy Gacad, Marie Koludrovic, K. Seibel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Flores v. Corrections Corp. of America, et al
as 13-60244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD FLORES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, M. MARTINEZ, Gang Coordinator (COCF), R. W. COOK, Facility Captain (COCF) and others
Paul Flores v. Robert Horel
as 11-56204
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL RICHARD FLORES
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT A. HOREL, Warden, Warden
Flores v. Correctional Corporation of America et al
as 2:2011cv00123
Plaintiff:
Richard Flores
Defendant:
Correctional Corporation of America, M. Martinez, R. W. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Thaler
as 2:2011cv00152
Petitioner:
David Richard Flores
Respondent:
Richard Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flores v. Caldwell et al
as 1:2010cv00233
Plaintiff:
Richard Flores
Defendant:
Debra Caldwell, Unknown Official, Dennis Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Flores v. T. McDonald, et al
as 09-55966
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD FLORES
Respondent - Appellee:
T. MCDONALD, Chief and MELISSA LEA, Chief Deputy Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
