Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Manuel v. Delaware Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Karl B. Manuel
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Matthew Mucha, Marcus Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Jones v. Woloshin, et al
as 1:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Quentin T. Jones
Defendant:
Staff Lt. Orlando DeJesus, Robert May, Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. DeJesus et al
as 1:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Quentin T. Jones
Defendant:
Staff Lt. Orlando DeJesus, Robert May, Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erskine v. James T. Vaughn Correctional Center C/O Dennis et al
as 1:2021cv01016
Plaintiff:
Justin Erskine
Defendant:
James T. Vaughn Correctional Center C/O Dennis, J.T.V.C.C Cpl Amari Brooks-Coleman, J.T.V.C.C Lt. Kevin Lorick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erskine v. Delaware Department of Corrections (DDOC) et al
as 1:2020cv01771
Plaintiff:
Justin Erskine
Defendant:
J.T.V.C.C S.Lt Orlando DeJesus, James T. Vaughn Correctional Center C/O Dennis, J.T.V.C.C Lt Heishman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Agricultural Dept. et al
as 6:2014cv00168
Plaintiff:
Oceanus Perry
Defendant:
Agricultural Dept., Dept. of Justice, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Douglas v. Alvardo et al
as 3:2009cv01015
Plaintiff:
Edward Douglas
Defendant:
Robert Alvardo, Richard Parson and Don Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOUGLAS v. PARSONS et al
as 2:2009cv02131
Petitioner:
EDWARD M DOUGLAS
Respondent:
RICHARD PARSONS and ROBERT A ALZARADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
DOUGLAS v. PARSONS et al
as 2:2009cv00085
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M DOUGLAS
Defendant:
RICHARD PARSONS and ROBERT A ALZARADO
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
